The spiral into neo-protectionism
Especially since the 1980s, design and architecture have been international in character. My old employers, Fitch, took over the Ohio product designers RichardsonSmith back in 1988; just a few years later, Foster Associates won the job to design Hong Kong’s Chep Lap Kok airport. Today big design and architecture firms not only work all over the world, but have at least a few offices across Europe, China, and elsewhere. The globalisation of design practice also dominates multinationals. Samsung’s 1600 designers work in London, Los Angeles, Shanghai, Delhi, Tokyo and Milan, as well as in a Gensler-designed studio in San Francisco. The firm will also open Virtual Reality film production in New York City.
Now that the Edward Snowden furore has subsided, the Balkanisation of the Internet seems set on hold, even if China, Turkey and other countries still censor foreign content on the Web. What, then, could stop the practice of design and architecture crossing borders still further? More than a Brexit or a Grexit from the EU might suggest; and more, too, than might be implied by Brussels vs Washington spats over the tax evasions (sorry, ‘tax planning’) of Google and other US tech firms.
There have always been frictions in world trade – around intellectual property, and around visas for immigrant designers. But since the Crash of 2008, world trade has been rising at only 80 per cent of the rate of world GDP growth – a turnaround on the pattern of the previous two decades, even if some suggest that trade will 20 per cent grow faster than world output in 2016. Of course, supply chains for product and building components remain as far-flung as ever, and tendencies toward ‘reshoring’ – bringing back parts of manufacturing from offshore locations – are still vigorously debated: eggheads at AT Kearney are sceptical, but the Boston Consulting Group is bullish.
Yet there are other, more subterranean trends. Disputes have long moved on from the imposition of tariffs and quotas to the demand that inward investors make things with high levels of local content – so much so that among petrol-driven cars, those with the most American-sourced components are today made by Toyota. And new, if qualified, kinds of autarchy have emerged. Yes, Apple hardware goes on being mostly manufactured in China; but now China is heading toward America in its relative independence from export markets.
On top of this, multilateral trade agreements wither, while bilateral arrangements multiply. Moreover, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) are strongly protectionist.
The US, Japan and 10 other Pacific Rim countries agreed the TTP in October 2015, but opponents or a world slump could easily frustrate ratification. The putative US-EU TTIP could meet the same fate. Both are bastard children, chaotically born to exclude China, which since 2009 has been the world’s largest exporter of goods.
The two partnerships reveal that, in tomorrow’s bigger-than-ever trade blocs, standards – around sustainability, media correctness and preventive measures in health and safety – will be used to exclude unwanted imports from non-partnering nations (on top of China, think India). And tensions also abound inside the TTIP: the EU worries about the US taking too many risks in food and pharmaceuticals, while America could fine Volkswagen up to $48bn for its iffy vehicle emissions.
Designers and architects, wake up! Tracking the provenance of your ingredients, raw materials and labour supply will be more common: a Royal College of Art student has already pioneered a mobile app to do just this to supermarket produce. Clearly, food labeling will grow more complex.
There’s more. Design professionals will need to know more international law, and should expect truly swingeing reprisals when, overseas, a product is recalled or a building collapses – and that’s without Santiago Calatrava rejigging the White House for Donald Trump. Design for state-owned exporters will be trickier. It will be harder to move around the planet, and more national prejudice will infect those global conference calls. No doubt, too, an ascendant Africa (Kenya, for example) will be given the China treatment, just as Brussels already meddles with democratically elected governments in Eastern Europe.
In 1932, when the Depression brought about beggar-thy-neighbour policies in international trade and currencies, Henry-Russell Hitchcock and Philip Johnson defined the International Style in architecture. Naturally, tomorrow’s world economy will see no simple replay of the 1930s. But who will now come forward to uphold internationalism in architecture and design?
Articles grouped by Tag
Recent Tweets by @JamesWoudhuysen
@peterlhill1 @spikedonline What about listing all the 1960s comedies that would now be banned? Till Death Us Do Part; Steptoe & Son; Benny Hill; possibly the two Ronnies… What else would be hit by the Photoshop Police of our youthful Stalins?
Great article! FRIENDS now held racist, multiphobic, etc. Yes, us youthful Puritans resolve to erase the very recent past, fear the future, hate old people and white men, and live only in what WE have created: THE PRESENT, and VICTIMHOOD bit.ly/2EXoSBd @spikedonline pic.twitter.com/sxoJ47xVfo
Union-assisted rationalisations have tamed labour costs, cut capex, upped margins. Now that 2 in every 5 VWs go to China, VW has managed to pay off $15bn of its $25bn emissions damages Yet cash rose from $21.5bn to $25.4bn, 2015-7. Mmm, FINANCIALISATION! ft.com/content/a12ec7…
“A small, rather scary-looking man... he bought his first nightclub in the 1950s — Il Grotto, in Ilford.” Hilarious, dead-pan obituary of a Soho rascal, whose voice had a Kenneth Williams ooh-matron quality, and whose clients mostly seem to have been... undercover reporters pic.twitter.com/4mVKbmcRV6
RECOMMENDED: Netflix’s MANHUNT: UNABOMBER. Skilfully shows how the nutter’s anti-industrialisation views were acquiesced to in 1995. Now those views are even more mainstream, as Elon Musk & Stephen Hawking warn of an IT Apocalypse. Me on the doom mongers: bit.ly/2DeJA3k pic.twitter.com/1rJ378nEMr
Innovators I like
Robert Furchgott – discovered that nitric oxide transmits signals within the human body
Barry Marshall – showed that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori is the cause of most peptic ulcers, reversing decades of medical doctrine holding that ulcers were caused by stress, spicy foods, and too much acid
N Joseph Woodland – co-inventor of the barcode
Jocelyn Bell Burnell – she discovered the first radio pulsars
John Tyndall – the man who worked out why the sky was blue
Rosalind Franklin co-discovered the structure of DNA, with Crick and Watson
Rosalyn Sussman Yallow – development of radioimmunoassay (RIA), a method of quantifying minute amounts of biological substances in the body
Jonas Salk – discovery and development of the first successful polio vaccine
John Waterlow – discovered that lack of body potassium causes altitude sickness. First experiment: on himself
Werner Forssmann – the first man to insert a catheter into a human heart: his own
Bruce Bayer – scientist with Kodak whose invention of a colour filter array enabled digital imaging sensors to capture colour
Yuri Gagarin – first man in space. My piece of fandom: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/10421
Sir Godfrey Hounsfield – inventor, with Robert Ledley, of the CAT scanner
Martin Cooper – inventor of the mobile phone
Thomas Tuohy – Windscale manager who doused the flames of the 1957 fire
Eugene Polley – TV remote controls
George Devol – 'father of robotics’ who helped to revolutionise carmaking